10 Best B2B Website Redesign Agencies in 2026

Disclosure: Webgate publishes this comparison and includes its own services. This is an editorial shortlist based on the criteria and public sources below, not an independent ranking.

The best B2B website redesign agencies do more than make your company look current. They make your product easier to understand, help the right buyers take the next step, and give your marketing team a website it can actually manage.

Whether you are comparing SaaS website redesign companies or broader B2B web design agencies, start with the business problem—not the portfolio screenshots.

For a mid-market B2B shortlist, consider Webgate for WordPress redesigns and ongoing WebOps, Bop Design for content-led B2B marketing, HUEMOR for buyer-focused technology websites, and Webstacks for composable platforms. Clay, Ramotion, Baunfire, Refokus, Flow Ninja and Amply offer different strengths in branding, digital experience and website delivery. [1][6][8][11]

This guide compares ten companies by published budget guidance, CMS, relevant industries, named website clients, available results and post-launch support. It is written for CMOs, marketing leaders, website managers and founders choosing a partner for an established B2B or SaaS website.

Which B2B website redesign agencies should you shortlist?

Start with the constraint that matters most: your CMS, the scale of the migration, the depth of the brand change, or the team you need after launch. Use the detailed profiles to verify scope before requesting proposals.

• WordPress with ongoing website operations: Webgate. Compare Bop Design for a broader content-marketing partnership and HUEMOR for a strategy-led redesign. [1][6][10]
• Headless or composable architecture: Webstacks. Its CMS offering includes Sanity, Contentful and other structured-content platforms. [11]
• Brand and website transformation: Clay, Ramotion and Baunfire. Examine website-specific case studies rather than relying on their wider client lists. [15][20][24]
• Webflow-led delivery: Flow Ninja and Amply. Refokus is another option when narrative, motion and a distinctive visual identity are central to the brief. [25][28][31]
• Complex international WordPress sites: Webgate’s Bloomreach and Veridas work offers relevant examples of multilingual delivery and ongoing improvement. [2][3]

How we compared B2B website redesign agencies

We reviewed public agency service pages, pricing pages and project case studies available on October 20, 2026. Selection focused on relevant B2B or technology website work, identifiable clients, delivery capabilities and clarity about ongoing support. The ten agencies are not an exhaustive market list, and their projects were not necessarily delivered in 2026.

• Budgets are labeled by type. A starting fee is not a typical project total. “Custom quote” means no suitable full-redesign price was identified in the reviewed agency sources. Dollar amounts are USD; Webgate’s EUR and USD offers are published separately, not currency conversions.
• Client scope matters. A resource center, interactive demo or product-design assignment is not the same as rebuilding an entire corporate website.
• Results are not standardized. Case-study figures are publisher-reported and were not independently audited for this comparison. Traffic, downloads, request speed and lead quality are different measures. Missing public KPIs do not establish poor performance.

10 B2B website redesign agencies compared

Use this overview to narrow the field, not to select the lowest number. Compare quotes only after matching strategy, content, design, migration, integrations, QA and post-launch responsibilities.

Budget note: These figures are not like-for-like offers or ceilings. Hosting, platform subscriptions, taxes, content production and ongoing support may be separate. Confirm the total scope with each agency. A large enterprise migration should not be budgeted at an advertised entry price.

1. Webgate — WordPress redesigns with ongoing WebOps

Consider Webgate when you need a WordPress redesign and a team to keep improving the website after launch. The relevant fit is an established marketing team dealing with complex content, international pages, integrations or development bottlenecks. [1][4]

• Industries and focus: B2B technology, marketing technology and identity technology; website strategy, UX/UI, WordPress development, migration, performance and WebOps. [2][3][4]
• CMS: WordPress and Elementor. [1]
• Budget: Design and development starts at €9,000 or $9,000 on the published pricing page. Complex redesigns require a scoped quote; these are not the disclosed budgets of the featured client projects. [1]
• Named website clients: Bloomreach and Veridas. Bloomreach’s project covers a 1,200+ page platform; Veridas combines redesign with documented technical improvements. [2][3]
• Ongoing support: WebOps starts at €1,000 or $1,000 per month, with design/development capacity and technical maintenance described in the offer. Confirm response commitments and capacity in the proposal. [1]

What to evaluate: Ask for a walkthrough of the reusable page system, the migration plan and the workflow for campaign requests. Look beyond the homepage design to what your team can manage independently.

When to compare alternatives: A Webflow-only or headless-first brief deserves a platform-specific comparison. Do not change an appropriate CMS simply to match an agency’s preferred stack.

2. Bop Design — B2B websites supported by content marketing

Bop Design is worth considering when the website, messaging and ongoing content marketing need to improve together. Its published positioning is specifically B2B, with WordPress development and content services rather than a design-only engagement. [6]

• Industries: SaaS, technology, industrial businesses, engineering and professional services. [6]
• CMS and budget: WordPress; most published B2B website engagements fall between $25,000 and $75,000. [5][6]
• Named clients: Pivotree and Perr&Knight appear in its published work and client references. [6]
• Published result: Bop reports a 98.54% increase in referral sessions for Pivotree following launch. This is a referral-traffic measure, not a revenue or qualified-lead increase; ask for the comparison period and underlying report. [6]
• Ongoing support: Content and marketing services are available. Its SaaS offer also includes 30 days of post-launch monitoring and issue resolution. [6][7]

What to evaluate: Clarify which messaging, copywriting and SEO deliverables are included in the redesign, and which require an ongoing engagement. Ask how editorial priorities will connect to sales-qualified opportunities.

3. HUEMOR — Buyer-focused websites for SaaS and technology companies

HUEMOR is a relevant option when a technically strong company needs a clearer buyer-facing website. Its Boston Dynamics project is a useful example: the engagement addressed business use cases, navigation, WordPress implementation and marketing-team control. [9]

• Industries: SaaS and technology, with published work extending to robotics and industrial companies. [8][9][10]
• CMS: WordPress, HubSpot and Webflow are listed service platforms. [10]
• Budget: HUEMOR says most SaaS redesigns fall between $50,000 and $100,000. Other scopes can differ. [8]
• Named website references: Boston Dynamics, BetterCloud and Mark43. [8][9]
• Evidence: The Boston Dynamics case describes improved content management and a buyer-oriented structure. It does not publish a numerical conversion uplift in the reviewed version. [9]
• Ongoing support: Website support is offered from $2,500 per month, separately from redesign pricing. [10]

What to evaluate: Ask how the team will translate technical capabilities into industry-specific buying journeys. Agree on what counts as a qualified inquiry before treating more form submissions as success.

4. Webstacks — Composable websites and headless CMS implementations

Webstacks is a strong shortlist candidate when the redesign includes a composable or headless architecture. This means separating structured content management from the website’s front end, with a delivery model that can include continued development after launch. [11][14]

• Industries: SaaS, fintech, AI and enterprise software. [13]
• CMS: Sanity, Contentful and other headless systems, plus traditional platforms including Webflow, HubSpot and WordPress. [11]
• Budget: Request a scoped quote. No suitable agency-published full-redesign range was identified in the sources reviewed.
• Named website clients: 9fin, Calendly and ServiceTitan. [12][13]
• Published result: Webstacks reports 118% more website visitors for 9fin in the first three months after a phased rollout. The site uses Sanity, Next.js and Vercel. Visitor growth is not a measured conversion or revenue uplift. [12]
• Ongoing support: Website Product Teams provide a continuing delivery model. [14]

What to evaluate: Request a demonstration of editing, previewing and publishing. Ask who maintains the front-end application, integrations and deployment pipeline. Choose headless because your requirements justify it, not because the architecture sounds more advanced.

5. Baunfire — Brand-led corporate website redesigns

Baunfire is worth evaluating for a brand-led corporate website with substantial UX and visual-design work. Its Karat case covers website branding, user experience, development and interaction design, making it more relevant than a generic corporate logo list. [15]

• Industries and references: Technology and corporate B2B websites, with published projects for Karat, Cellares and Ambi Robotics. [15][16]
• CMS: Baunfire lists WordPress, Craft CMS and custom CMS solutions on its content management service page. The Karat case does not identify which of these it uses. [15]
• Budget: Clutch lists a $25,000+ minimum project size. This is a directory-listed entry threshold, not a typical full-redesign quote. [18]
• Evidence: Karat’s case demonstrates the delivered website and design approach. A quantified lead or conversion increase is not published in that case. [15]
• Ongoing support: Baunfire offers an agency-of-record arrangement for ongoing design needs. Confirm maintenance, development capacity and incident response separately. [17]

What to evaluate: Separate brand and design deliverables from migration, content production and operations. Ask for an editing demonstration and the support responsibilities that apply after the launch project ends.

6. Clay — Brand and enterprise website experience

Clay is relevant when a website redesign is part of a larger brand or digital-experience change. Its website portfolio includes Tipalti, Marqeta and Cornerstone, providing specific B2B and fintech references beyond the agency’s broader product-design work. [19][21]

• Industries: Enterprise software, fintech and technology. [19][21]
• CMS: The CMS is project-specific; the reviewed Tipalti design case does not name its implementation platform. Establish the CMS and editing requirements in the proposal. [20]
• Budget: Custom proposal. Clay lists fixed-fee, time-and-materials and retainer engagement models rather than a standard website package price. [19]
• Redesign evidence: Tipalti’s project includes a clearer navigation system and reusable design components. The published case does not establish a numerical conversion improvement. [20]
• Ongoing support: Retainer arrangements are available; agree on whether yours covers design, implementation, optimization or technical operations. [19]

What to evaluate: Check which deliverables belong to the website team versus branding or product-design teams. Request a website-specific reference call, particularly when content migration and ongoing publishing are significant parts of the brief.

7. Ramotion — SaaS brand and marketing website transformation

Ramotion is worth considering when SaaS positioning, brand consistency and the marketing website need to evolve together. Its Clearbit website transformation gives buyers a directly relevant B2B example, rather than relying only on the agency’s wider design portfolio. [22][24]

• Industries: SaaS and technology, including B2B data platforms. [22][24]
• CMS: Its website service lists WordPress, Webflow and headless options including Next.js and DatoCMS. The actual choice is scoped to the project. [23]
• Budget: The SaaS service page gives a standard-project range of $50,000 to over $150,000. [22]
• Named website reference: Clearbit. Review the exact transformation scope with the agency. [24]
• Evidence: Use the website deliverables as portfolio evidence. Do not treat a client’s acquisition value, funding or overall growth as an attributable website-redesign KPI.
• Ongoing support: Discuss an ongoing engagement alongside the initial project, and specify design, development and maintenance responsibilities. [22]

What to evaluate: Make sure the proposed team owns implementation as well as design. Ask how the new system will support product launches, documentation links, comparison pages and content updates without weakening brand consistency.

8. Refokus — Distinctive websites for B2B technology brands

Refokus is an option when differentiation and product storytelling are central to the redesign. Its services bring narrative, design, motion and development together, with a published focus on B2B technology startups and a deep Webflow track record. [25]

• Industries and clients: B2B technology, including Chargeflow’s chargeback platform and Lavender’s AI email product. [26][27]
• CMS: Primarily Webflow; Refokus also describes using Framer, Astro or custom development when appropriate. [25]
• Budget: Custom quote. No suitable full-redesign range was identified in the agency sources reviewed.
• Evidence: Published cases demonstrate website delivery and CMS work, but do not provide comparable, independently verified conversion figures. [26][27]
• Ongoing support: The website offer includes launch support and a client-manageable CMS. Recurring operations should be scoped separately; baseline SEO/AEO setup is not an ongoing content and reporting service. [25]

What to evaluate: For a large enterprise migration, request a comparable project reference. Set explicit requirements for accessibility, reduced motion, performance and editing simplicity so the distinctive experience remains practical to operate.

9. Flow Ninja — Enterprise Webflow delivery and ongoing operations

Flow Ninja is a relevant option for companies committed to Webflow and looking for both transformation and ongoing WebOps. Its published references include Trustly and a clearly defined resource-center engagement for Upwork. [28][29][30]

• Industries: Fintech and technology platforms, including enterprise content operations. [29][30]
• CMS: Webflow. [29][30]
• Budget: The current pricing page lists flowTransform from $50,000 for strategic web design and replatforming. This is a starting fee, not a typical final budget. [28]
• Published evidence: Its Upwork case says the client team added 3,000+ resources after the resource-center redesign. That demonstrates content scale; it is not a lead-growth figure or a claim to have rebuilt the whole Upwork platform. [29]
• Ongoing support: Published retainers start at $6,000 per month with a 12-month commitment in the pricing FAQ. Confirm the current package and terms. [28]

What to evaluate: Ask how the agency handles localization, CMS structure and publishing permissions. Compare ongoing capacity and contract length, not just the monthly fee.

10. Amply — B2B Webflow redesigns and continuous improvement

Amply is worth shortlisting for a B2B Webflow redesign followed by continued website iteration. Its public portfolio includes SaaS, finance and cybersecurity examples, giving buyers several ways to assess experience with technical products. [31][32][33]

• Industries and clients: Zeni in AI-powered finance, plus cybersecurity work for Anvilogic and Legato Security. [32][33]
• CMS: Webflow. [32][33]
• Budget: Amply’s B2B-services page gives a typical range of $15,000–$60,000. Treat this as guidance for that offer, not a ceiling for every SaaS or enterprise engagement. [31]
• Published result: Amply reports a 40% increase in month-over-month downloads for Legato Security after its WordPress-to-Webflow rebuild. Downloads are not equivalent to qualified demos; request the baseline and reporting period. [32]
• Ongoing support: Webflow maintenance retainers cover continuing website work, with advertised pricing from $3,000 per month. [34]

What to evaluate: Confirm how strategy, messaging, migration and optimization are split between the initial project and retainer. Ask how content downloads are connected to opportunity creation in your CRM.

Enterprise website redesign examples

The strongest case-study question is not “Have you worked with a big company?” It is “Have you solved a website problem like ours?” Bloomreach and Veridas illustrate two different reasons to hire a redesign and operations partner.

Bloomreach: make a large marketing website easier to manage

Webgate’s published Bloomreach case describes moving a 1,200+ page website in three languages from a custom Java-based CMS to WordPress and Elementor. The system includes 40+ page templates and 50+ reusable components to support repeatable page creation. [2]

The practical relevance is marketing control across a large content estate. The case also reports up to 50% development-cost savings and 30% faster delivery; these are Webgate-reported figures, not independently audited guarantees or evidence of higher conversion rates. [2]

Veridas: improve the website beyond its visual design

Webgate’s current Veridas case covers 300+ pages across four languages. It reports tested marketing-email request responses improving from 6.6 seconds to 0.13 seconds and active WordPress plugins decreasing from 58 to 39. [3]

The request measurement is not full-page load time. Separately, the case records mobile-origin CrUX Largest Contentful Paint of 2.0 seconds, captured October 19, 2026, while INP still needed improvement. That distinction matters: a faster loading metric does not mean every performance measure has passed. [3]

The lesson for a buyer is to commission the right problem: content operations for one website, technical cleanup and reliability for another. A visual refresh alone may not address either.

Discuss your website redesign Explore the Bloomreach project

How to choose a B2B website redesign agency

Use the same brief with three agencies. A useful proposal comparison matches responsibilities, assumptions and success measures—not just a price and a delivery date. Decide which partner fits your operating model before negotiating details.

Start with the business problem, not the replacement CMS

Write down what is failing today: buyers cannot understand the product, valuable pages are hard to find, marketing waits too long for changes, or the technical foundation creates avoidable risk. Separate evidence from opinions about whether the site looks old.

Consider a phased improvement when the brand, structure and CMS still work. Consider a broader redesign when positioning, navigation, templates and the technical platform all need to change. Ask agencies to explain why their proposed scope is necessary.

Compare the whole first year

Request one view of discovery, copy, design, migration, development, integrations, launch support, hosting, subscriptions and ongoing capacity. Have the agency identify exclusions, client responsibilities and change-request rules. Do not compare a design-and-build proposal with a development-only price.

Ask for evidence you can use

For every claimed result, ask for the baseline, measurement period, metric definition and other work that happened at the same time. 

If paid media or content investment increased after launch, factor that into your interpretation. Ask to see a relevant CMS workflow as well as a before-and-after screenshot.

• Qualified demand: Track sales-accepted inquiries, qualified demo requests and website-influenced opportunities, using definitions agreed with sales.
• Marketing delivery: Track the time from an approved request to a live page, and which updates marketers can complete without engineering.
• Technical health: Track performance, successful form delivery, indexable priority pages, incidents and recurring defects against an agreed baseline.

Define the operating relationship before launch

Ask who handles urgent problems, what response time is contracted, how requests are prioritized and how much capacity is included. Require a clear handover covering accounts, source files, CMS access, documentation and training. A successful redesign should not leave routine website work dependent on one unavailable person.

B2B website redesign brief: what to send an agency

Give each agency the same inputs so its recommendation can be compared fairly. A concise brief is more useful than a long wish list without priorities.

• Your website URL, business model, target buyers and the three problems the project must solve.
• The pages, languages and integrations involved, including the content that must be preserved or migrated.
• Your current CMS, the reasons to keep or change it, and who will maintain it after launch.
• Available brand guidelines, approved messaging, product visuals, copywriting resources and internal decision-makers.
• Your budget range, launch constraints and the difference between essential launch scope and later improvements.
• The measures you will use at launch and after 90 days, including qualified demand, delivery speed and technical health.

Ask each agency to return its recommended approach, assumptions, exclusions, team, timeline, price breakdown and post-launch plan. That turns ten interesting agencies into a defensible shortlist.

B2B website redesign FAQs

These questions address the decisions that commonly remain after reviewing an agency portfolio: proof, budget, technology, timing and responsibility after launch.

Which website redesign agencies have experience with mid-market B2B companies and enterprise clients?

The reviewed website references include Webgate with Bloomreach and Veridas, HUEMOR with Boston Dynamics, Webstacks with Calendly and ServiceTitan, and Clay with Tipalti and Cornerstone. 

Flow Ninja’s Upwork reference is specifically a resource center. Ask each agency for a project comparable to your scope; a recognized client name alone does not verify whole-site delivery. Bloomreach case study · Veridas case study · Boston Dynamics case study · Webstacks projects · Clay website portfolio · Upwork resource-center case study

How much does a B2B website redesign cost in 2026?

There is no single comparable market price in this shortlist. Bop Design publishes a usual $25,000–$75,000 range, HUEMOR publishes $50,000–$100,000 for most SaaS redesigns, and Ramotion lists $50,000 to over $150,000 for standard SaaS projects. Lower starting fees elsewhere do not describe the same scope. Request matched proposals. Bop Design FAQ · HUEMOR SaaS services · Ramotion SaaS services

Should we choose a WordPress agency, a Webflow agency or a headless specialist?

Choose after testing your requirements: publishing workflow, integrations, localization, governance, maintenance and ownership. 

Webgate’s offer centers on WordPress and Elementor; Flow Ninja’s on Webflow; Webstacks offers headless and traditional CMS implementations. Require a realistic editing demonstration before committing to a stack. Webgate pricing · Webstacks CMS services · Flow Ninja pricing

How long should we allow for a website redesign?

Use the proposed scope and your content readiness to build the schedule. For reference, Webgate publishes 8–12 weeks for its design-and-development offer, HUEMOR gives 12–16 weeks for SaaS, and Bop Design gives 16–20 weeks for an average SaaS website. These are offer-specific estimates, not promises for every enterprise migration. Webgate pricing · Bop Design SaaS services · HUEMOR SaaS services

Can an agency guarantee more leads or zero SEO loss?

Treat absolute guarantees cautiously. Instead, ask for a measurement plan, a migration checklist, monitoring responsibilities and a remediation process. A supplier can commit to deliverables and response times; whether more visits become qualified opportunities also depends on the offer, audience, content and sales follow-up.

Do we need ongoing support after the redesign?

Plan who will own the website after launch, whether that is your internal team, an agency or both. Specify responsibilities for content changes, integrations, analytics, optimization and incidents. 

Distinguish a short post-launch warranty from a recurring agreement with meaningful delivery capacity.

Planning a B2B website redesign?

Choose the agency that can explain what needs to change, why it matters and how your team will operate the website afterward. A polished portfolio earns a conversation. A credible delivery and measurement plan earns a place on the shortlist.

Webgate works on WordPress and Elementor redesigns, migrations and ongoing website operations. 

Bring your current website, business goals, budget range and launch constraints to the conversation. We can discuss whether your next step should be a focused improvement, a phased redesign or a broader rebuild. [1][4]

Discuss your B2B website See Webgate’s services and pricing

Related reading: Bloomreach’s website migration, Veridas’ redesign and performance work, and ongoing website strategy and care.

Sources

• [1] Webgate: Design, development and WebOps pricing
• [2] Webgate: Bloomreach website redesign and migration
• [3] Webgate: Veridas website redesign, performance and WebOps
• [4] Webgate: Website strategy and ongoing care
• [5] Bop Design: Frequently asked questions
• [6] Bop Design: B2B services, clients and published results
• [7] Bop Design: B2B SaaS website design
• [8] HUEMOR: SaaS website design
• [9] HUEMOR: Boston Dynamics case study
• [10] HUEMOR: Website services and support
• [11] Webstacks: CMS implementation
• [12] Webstacks: 9fin website redesign and migration
• [13] Webstacks: Published case studies
• [14] Webstacks: Website Product Teams
• [15] Baunfire: Karat website case study
• [16] Baunfire: Selected website projects
• [17] Baunfire: Services and engagement models
• [18] Clutch: Baunfire agency profile
• [19] Clay: Services and engagement models
• [20] Clay: Tipalti web design and design system
• [21] Clay: Website portfolio
• [22] Ramotion: SaaS web design
• [23] Ramotion: Web design and development
• [24] Ramotion: Clearbit website transformation
• [25] Refokus: B2B technology website services
• [26] Refokus: Chargeflow website case study
• [27] Refokus: Lavender website case study
• [28] Flow Ninja: Current website investment and pricing
• [29] Flow Ninja: Upwork resource-center project
• [30] Flow Ninja: Web design services and Trustly reference
• [31] Amply: B2B services website design
• [32] Amply: Cybersecurity website work
• [33] Amply: Zeni website redesign
• [34] Amply: Webflow maintenance